<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Is the Mobile Web Dead?&#8221; &#8211; enough already!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eclecticguy.com/2008/04/15/is-the-mobile-web-dead-enough-already/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eclecticguy.com/2008/04/15/is-the-mobile-web-dead-enough-already/</link>
	<description>musings of just some guy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:21:53 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.eclecticguy.com/2008/04/15/is-the-mobile-web-dead-enough-already/comment-page-1/#comment-326</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eclecticguy.com/2008/04/15/is-the-mobile-web-dead-enough-already/#comment-326</guid>
		<description>Yeah - so only as much as the &quot;web was dead&quot; in 1995 when the browsers were poor, modems were expensive, there wasn&#039;t much content, and the on-line world was ruled by the business models of AOL and Compuserve.

40 years ago we sat around a lonely radio in the living room to listen to recorded music. Now music is everywhere, pervasive, er, mobile.

The web is no different. Today&#039;s lonely sedentary web experience is directly analogous to our forbears sitting in the corner of a room to listen to music. But the web wants to be everywhere, pervasive, er, mobile.

Its gradual untethering - to become the mobile web - is inevitable. 10 years, and we&#039;ll think it hilarious that we ever thought differently.

(I hope no-one doubts it simply because of the parochial business models and power struggles of today&#039;s current ecosystem.)

So yes, I think you&#039;re right in your analysis.

The rise and rise of sites that are made-for-mobile (indeed, even made-for-iPhone) have already busted the myth that a browser&#039;s ability to render any type of markup means that the user on the other side of the screen (a human!) will actually be getting what they want.

If a mobile human is equally satisfied by a service that was designed for a non-mobile human, then it can only be by chance.

That&#039;s when the mobile web will really excel: when people start to treat it as the unique, ubiquitous medium that it really is - rather than some poor pastiche of their current comfort zone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah &#8211; so only as much as the &#8220;web was dead&#8221; in 1995 when the browsers were poor, modems were expensive, there wasn&#8217;t much content, and the on-line world was ruled by the business models of AOL and Compuserve.</p>
<p>40 years ago we sat around a lonely radio in the living room to listen to recorded music. Now music is everywhere, pervasive, er, mobile.</p>
<p>The web is no different. Today&#8217;s lonely sedentary web experience is directly analogous to our forbears sitting in the corner of a room to listen to music. But the web wants to be everywhere, pervasive, er, mobile.</p>
<p>Its gradual untethering &#8211; to become the mobile web &#8211; is inevitable. 10 years, and we&#8217;ll think it hilarious that we ever thought differently.</p>
<p>(I hope no-one doubts it simply because of the parochial business models and power struggles of today&#8217;s current ecosystem.)</p>
<p>So yes, I think you&#8217;re right in your analysis.</p>
<p>The rise and rise of sites that are made-for-mobile (indeed, even made-for-iPhone) have already busted the myth that a browser&#8217;s ability to render any type of markup means that the user on the other side of the screen (a human!) will actually be getting what they want.</p>
<p>If a mobile human is equally satisfied by a service that was designed for a non-mobile human, then it can only be by chance.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s when the mobile web will really excel: when people start to treat it as the unique, ubiquitous medium that it really is &#8211; rather than some poor pastiche of their current comfort zone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
